This might be better in a different thread since we're getting of the topic of music. If you want to start another thread, I'll join you there.
Quote:
To say He wasn't talking about knowledge seems incorrect from the context.
Quote:
22You Samaritans worship what you do not know; we worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth,
Now the "has now come" does correct me on which side of eternity was being refered to. I was wrong <- not so hard to say afterall. But I don't think you can read "know" and "do not know" coupled with a "Yet" and say Jesus was not talking about knowledge.
|
The Samaritans had built their own version of The Temple in Jerusalem. They had full knowledge of "how" to worship the God of Israel so there was no lack of "truth" when it came to an intellectual understanding of facts.
It's a very hebraic idiom to say we do something "in truth" when speaking of sincerity vs insincerity. It has nothing to do with knowledge. The Samaritans were missing a sincere relationship to the God of Israel.
Example: if I say, "I love my wife in truth" it doesn't simply mean that I have true factual knowledge about her. It means I sincerely love her.
Quote:
Also for the record I wasn't spouting inaccurate/useless doctine.
|
Please don't receive offense because I didn't intend that. I was using your post as an example of something that has been taught throughout church history which is missing the point of what a jewish man was saying to other jews.
We can interpret jews speaking to jews through a greek philosophical understanding and (innocently) miss the point quite easily
I'm only saying that we have been doing so for a long time....please don't take it personally.
Quote:
|
.I do believe we can understand the scriptures, exactly as they were intended. Taking the case of non-biblical writings as an example. Do you say we can't understand what anyone was trying to write if the text is over 10 years old? 100 years? 1,000 years? Or how different of a culture would it need to be can Europeans and North Americans understand each others writing? South Amereicans? Asians? Middle Easterners? I do think that a study of the "authors" context would be very useful perhaps even essential but I wouldn't agree that it is impossible.
|
I wouldn't say it's impossible to get the general idea of a topic using lots of information and applying contextual knowledge, but I
am saying that it is impossible to get accurate and complete knowledge apart from the original author speaking to the original audience in the original language and culture.
Example: For a Hawaiian to completely understand a snow-ball fight, he'd have to understand what snow is. Without some concept of ice falling from the sky, how would he understand it as well as an Eskimo?